From "The Book of Questions" by Gregory Stock, PH.D
Q #87
Which of the following restrictions could you best tolerate: Leaving the USA permanently, or never leaving the state in which you now live?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Just things I wonder about ... and some people are nice enough to answer. You are welcome to answer, too ... just click on "Comments" and off you go! IF you don't want to be Anonymous, use the Name/URL option and just put in your name ... no URL required .... Starting Jan 28th, 2009, I am using questions from "Table Topics: Right or Wrong?"
5 comments:
Neither! I do not do well with boundaries, never have. But if I had to choose one, it would be Leaving the USA permanently since I would have the whole rest of the world to travel and live in.
I agree with PEF. I love to travel too much! So, I would have to permanently exit the USA.
On the other hand though, seeing how BIG TEXAS is, if I were restricted to never leave it, I would still have lots of land to explore.
If I had to choose between the two, I'd choose the latter. At least my family lives here.And everyone else could come and visit me! LOL
I do not like either choice. But, If I have to choose, I pick not leaving this state - leaving the US permanently is not an option.
Hard choice. There are places in the world I love...Munich, Florence, London, Lido di Spina, Montserrat, Acapulco, and etc. But to leave US? For good? My heart is here in Texas, but I do have to breathe. Don't think I could do either.
Post a Comment